1) Banner Advertising -- This may not be a creative audience-based money maker, but it works. Advertising is based on audience size, and with a large audience, Twitter should be able to crank out some money using traditional banner advertising. Twitter is already trying this experiment in Japan, and if it is successful, there is no reason that the company won’t roll banner advertising out to Twitter users everywhere.
2) Paid Posts -- Banners won’t reach the hundreds of thousands of users who don’t actually use the Twitter.com site, but who only interact with Twitter through third-party applications or SMS messaging. By allowing advertisers to pay to send a Twitter post that is distributed to all (or a percentage of) Twitter users, advertisers will be able to reach the audience in a relevant format. Posts would have to be tagged as sponsored, of course, and there would have to be limits on the number and frequency that they are sent to users, but this would be a fast way to reach the vast audience.3) Sponsorships -- If Twitter decides that it doesn’t want to manage a large number of advertiser relationships (which can be a big pain), it could opt for a sponsorship model that would allow one advertiser to sponsor the entire site for a period of time. That sponsor would dominate the inventory -- the banner slots, the paid messages, etc. -- and this type of sponsorship would not come cheap. But many companies will leap at the chance to be affiliated with such a popular and cutting-edge service. And the first few companies to do so will likely get a ton of publicity, as well.
4) Charge for ad-free usage -- No doubt many people will protest if Twitter adds advertising, since the service has been ad-free for so long. For those people, Twitter could introduce a no-ad option that would require users who didn’t want to see any ads to pay to use the service. This is something that Twitter co-founder Evan Williams did when he started Blogger, and it could definitely work again here.
5) Tiered subscription model -- Many Twitter users have been clamoring for a paid version of the product for months, offering to pay to use Twitter if it just would stay up. Twitter will always need to maintain a free service level in order to appeal to the masses and to continue to grow its audience, but there is clearly an opportunity to charge users for enhanced capabilities. For example, there may be subscriptions that promise constant uptime, offer the ability to include photos, or provide the option for other types of posts. Or, what if Twitter simply charges users $1 each week that it doesn’t go down? That would give users what they want, and would give Twitter a financial incentive to increase uptime, as well.
7) Charge companies that use the Twitter API -- Twitter’s API has been used to build some cool applications -- Twitterrific and Twhirl come to mind. And the API has at least 10x the amount of traffic of the Website, according to Williams. All the companies that are using the Twitter API can profit from the use of it with no benefit to Twitter. If Twitter continued to allow the free use of the API, with an understanding that they would get a percentage of all earnings based on profits, there would be some immediate revenue. Another suggestion is to charge for API requests with request-rate surcharges.
8) Affiliate program -- Users are recommending products, services, restaurants, stores and countries to visit all day long on Twitter. An affiliate program would allow users to sign up to start making money on some of their recommendations. If a user recommends a product that is part of the program, the user -- as well as Twitter -- would get a percentage of the sale.
9) List rental -- This may be a very Web 1.0 idea, but if Twitter put its opt-in email list on the market, it would earn a pretty penny.
10) Mobile payments -- This idea comes courtesy of Silicon Alley Insider, and it’s a good one. The P2P mobile payment market is wide open, and Twitter has the stuff in place to be able to capitalize.
These are just some of the many ways that Twitter could start making money quickly. Until it decides on a business model, however, Twitter will keep growing its audience while getting its cash the old-fashioned way -- through VC funding.
http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/14/10-ways-twitter-could-make-money-quickly?page=0%2C1
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment